When do we get the next one?

  • ebikefolder@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your first link is almost one year old. They did indeed prepare for a worst case, which didn’t occur after all. Coal and gas consumption (total, not just percentage wise) did not go up, but down instead.

    Yes, a mild winter helped. Unfortunately, winters are getting warmer and warmer, and the last one was no exception there.

    • Claidheamh@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So why is your country’s emissions per capita more than 50% higher than France’s (from here), despite a much higher renewables percentage in the power mix? Might it have something to do with how much more nuclear they have?

      Looking through your post history, we seem to be aligned in advocating for decarbonisation. If you really want to reach zero emissions as soon as possible, don’t you think we should be exploring every carbon free avenue, and shutting down every single fossil fuel power plant?

      Don’t fall for your government’s justifications, or fearmongering around nuclear. If we want to decarbonise the grid, we need it to complement renewables and fill the roles that renewables can’t by themselves. The longer we take to realise that, the longer we’ll keep burning greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.

      • ebikefolder@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not paying €79/month to review the whole statistics, but you know perfectly well that France started from a much lower number. They already had nuclear when we started to roll out renewables on a large scale. Are you by any chance familiar with the term “head start”?

        But decisions from 40 years ago are irrelevant for decisions today. Spilled milk.

      • ebikefolder@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        don’t you think we should be exploring every carbon free avenue, and shutting down every single fossil fuel power plant?

        Sure. But nuclear is probably not the answer: we don’t have those decades left it takes to build hundreds of new plants. Not to mention the astronomical cost. The ship had sailed 30 years ago.

        Edit: the last 3 nuclear plants we shut down this year had a combined capacity of around 4 GW. In 2022 we installed over 7 GW of solar and about 2.5 GW of wind capacity (this year it will probably significantly more)

        • Claidheamh@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We don’t need hundreds of new plants. France only has around 50 and it’s more than enough. It’s also feasible to retrofit existing coal plants with nuclear reactors, for example.

          30 years ago it was the same argument. “It takes too long, we needed to have started earlier”. Well, here we are now. Let’s not have kids 30 years from now saying the same thing.

          • ebikefolder@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            France regularly imports (renewable) electricity from Germany when they have to shut down some of their reactors due to cooling problems in summer. So 50 are not enough. For a smaller economy.

            • Claidheamh@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Every country imports electricity from their neighbours. Germany also imports from France. That’s how an interconnected power grid works.

                • Claidheamh@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Well, so has France. And at a larger percentage. While emitting disproportionately less carbon, which, again, is the whole point of this conversation. I’d rather not sacrifice climate for the sake of economy. Especially because the economy will suffer a lot more if we don’t get emissions under control.