Academic experts also criticise UN Food and Agriculture Organization for dismissing alternative proteins

Archived version: https://archive.ph/JcHVc

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not eating meat is probably the most effective thing an individual can do to fight climate change.

  • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s the oil companies all over again.
    “Yea, but what if we, like, continue doing the thing that makes us money until the tide has fully turned?”

  • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    it’s only bewildering if you are under the misapprehension that the UN wants to or will do anything at all about climate change

  • Xin_shill@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Prob because it’s about as effective for plastic pollution as telling people to recycle which was pushed by companies instead of actually stopping production of single use plastics.

    To actually address the issue, Major reforms are needed to manufacturing, transportation and by FAR most importantly, energy production. Attacking the 15% food production part is dumb and more likely to cause people to ignore the substantial benefits from the other initiatives because everyone changing their diet at once is a crazy goal.

    • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Honestly this might just self resolve. As the climate zones shift north there’s gonna be catastrophic herd losses. Meat will just get too expensive.