• space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    We can easily explain how a physical system produces consciousness.

    We literally can’t do that at all though, not even close.

    Because that’s literally a basic requirment of science.

    How? Science is based on making models from empirical observations about the world and yourself, one of these empirical observations is the observation that your phenomenal consciousness actually exists, seemingly in opposition to the physical world, maybe we should perhaps include that fact in our models?

    Also, you call it reductive. I don’t think it’s reductive.

    It’s literally how that category of metaphysical thought is called, it’s an actual philosophical term.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      How? Science is based on making models from empirical observations about the world and yourself

      Science requires falsafiability. It’s fine to belive other things, but science it a method, not a belief system.

      one of these empirical observations is the observation that your phenomenal consciousness actually exists, seemingly in opposition to the physical world, maybe we should perhaps include that fact in our models?

      Nothing I’ve seen seems to imply it’s outside of our models. You haven’t explained why that’s the case. We know how the humans brain and nervous system functions. It isn’t magic anymore.

      • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nothing I’ve seen seems to imply it’s outside of our models.

        It literally is tho. There is no mention of consciousness anywhere in either quantum mechanics or general relativity.