• FoxBJK@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not that a new connector is around the corner, but I love how people try to act like this will be an achilles heel for these laws. How long will it take to vote in an amendment that updates the connector?

      I get it, being anchored to one connection type sounds good now while it’s still somewhat new, but in 10 years it could be a burden. Still, I do not want to go back to the days of every device having a unique barrel connector.

      • LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 months ago

        I collect old handhelds. Each one having a unique charging and/or sync cable fuckin sucks and I’m so glad that USB is ubiquitous. My current daily driver has mini USB for data, but charges using a unique connector that plugs into a unique cradle that sends power to the device when hooked into the cradle. Without the cradle, ya ain’t charging this thing.

      • electromage@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well USB-C was published 9 years ago, and has been well-established, nearly ubiquitous for at least 5. Why did this take so long?

      • instamat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is my first thought when it comes to legislation like this. My representatives in government are the last people I would confer with when it comes to technology, so I don’t think they should pick phone charger standards.

      • PsychedSy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        How long will it take to vote in an amendment that updates the connector?

        Depends on what corporations and countries are backing it probably.

        I thoroughly agree the connector insanity was a pain in the ass (though, being a hoarder of cables it made me a sort of superhero) but I just really dislike governments dictating this kind of thing.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      USB-C is a connector shape, so there’s really no need for a USB-D. What you’re thinking of is USB 5.0, except the USB has a penchant for coming up with the dumbest names imaginable. The current latest (I think) version is 3.2 Gen 2x2, so the next major version will probably be called some bullshit like USB 3.2 Gen 2x2+1.

    • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      If the USB-IF can agree on it, why not?

      The USB-IF moves so slowly it might as well be standing still.

      • TechnoBabble@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think it’s good for USB standards to move slow.

        Finally just about every device I buy has USB-C now. If they release a new connector that’ll just mean using 2 different cables for everything again.