PoliticallyIncorrect@lemm.ee to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-28 months agoI need a distro that can work right out the box without too much hassle to configure it, which one would you recommend?message-squaremessage-square204fedilinkarrow-up1121arrow-down119file-text
arrow-up1102arrow-down1message-squareI need a distro that can work right out the box without too much hassle to configure it, which one would you recommend?PoliticallyIncorrect@lemm.ee to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-28 months agomessage-square204fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarekameecoding@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·8 months agoOnly the installation is harder for Arch, EndeavorOS is easier to use then Mint, and installation is same thanks to the gui installer. The difference between Arch with archinstall vs Endeavor is still the ease of installation.
minus-squarePetter1@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·8 months agoSo, the only difference to arch is, that you have a gui for installation? In that case, I like archinstall script more. Mostly because I think it’s faster.
minus-squarekameecoding@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoWhat you think and what is the reality to casual users are two different things
minus-squarePetter1@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 months agoHu? I never said that, I only told what I think I prefer for myself
Only the installation is harder for Arch, EndeavorOS is easier to use then Mint, and installation is same thanks to the gui installer.
The difference between Arch with archinstall vs Endeavor is still the ease of installation.
So, the only difference to arch is, that you have a gui for installation? In that case, I like archinstall script more. Mostly because I think it’s faster.
What you think and what is the reality to casual users are two different things
Hu? I never said that, I only told what I think I prefer for myself