Quote from:
Ghaddar, J.J., Caswell, M. “To go beyond”: towards a decolonial archival praxis. Arch Sci 19, 71–85 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09311-1
Do not let them gatekeep knowledge. Call it what you want.
Quote from:
Ghaddar, J.J., Caswell, M. “To go beyond”: towards a decolonial archival praxis. Arch Sci 19, 71–85 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09311-1
Do not let them gatekeep knowledge. Call it what you want.
That’s exactly the goal of Peer Community In: you put your paper on some archive, you ask a “Recommender” to recommend the paper, they select reviewers and the lot, and they decide to recommend or not your paper after some iteration of the process (classical peer review I’d say). Then you can update your paper in a final version, with a kind of stamped version saying it was recommended by XXX (the peer review process is published along as well, I believe).