• TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      8 months ago

      Noo it’s just a movie about dinosaurs you can’t just point out that it critiques science and capitalism, we love science and capitalism!!

        • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          Bioengineering is inherently dangerous with a high likelihood of disrupting Earth’s ecosystems, killing millions of people, etc. if you do something wrong. A key safety step, as they discuss in one of the movies, is making their organisms unable to reproduce so they can’t increase their populations unchecked. Which they failed to do. In real life there are people creating new viruses and there is no amount of security that makes that kind of work completely safe.

      • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        It criticises science for profit. They literally invite various scientists who know their stuff and they all tell Hammond he’s a fucking idiot. It’s much clearer in the books, though, where you get to read where they notice all the enclosure mistakes that were made by Hammond’s team.

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s a book thing more than a movie thing, IIRC. Hammond was more of an asshole cheapskate in the book.

  • Munchback@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    8 months ago

    Jurassic Park is a satirical comedy about capitalism. Hammond spares every expense. The first scene is a man being killed on the job. He built the park in a country with cheap labour and low safety standards. He essentially had 3 people running the park. They bred raptors just because they could and he put his own grandkids (a metaphor for the future) in danger due to his own hubris and ego. They are literally man made monsters in an amusement park created by exploiting nature using untested technology. The metaphor for the dangers of greed could not be more on the nose, and I’m baffled it isn’t more commonly understood.

    • MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      How dare you, Hammond is a kind old man with a dream! (and in the book he dies a pathetic death after everything’s already mostly resolved)

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 months ago

    My favorite part is when I have to take mandatory trainings on security and integrate automated scanners for vulnerable libraries, but none of our projects have funding to actually implement the basics, like encryption+authentication.

    • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      We have the mandatory security training at my company and they said it was going to be revised after a few of us showed how the advice it gave was insecure and incorrect!

      • mormegil@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        In a bank we work for, there is a mandatory security training for employees, mandated by the parent supranational. The bank tried to correct the mistakes in the training or at least make the training optional, as the bank provides its own, more correct program. Rejected by the mother company, mandatory training is mandatory, even if it is wrong.

    • SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I think they did at one point, but during the plot he’s the only one and he’s working unpaid overtime, because he warned them when he signed his original contract that the system they wanted needed more engineers and more time but they didn’t listen and then threatened him into working for free when the system wasn’t ready at the end of his original contract. This is the direct reason why he committed the corporate espionage that caused the whole park to go fubar.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    If there was documentation all over the place it would shatter my suspension of disbelief. It would ruin my dinosaur movie!

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    The counterpoint is that Nedry was hired to stand up infrastructure and is likely the one responsible for not properly staffing that effort. The CEO isn’t going to know anything about that and will naturally defer to the people hired for those tasks. If Ned says it’s all fine and he’s coming in under budget, no reason to doubt him.

    We all know lone wolf types which will hack together systems and pretend like everything is fine just so they’ll never be bothered by the presence of others questioning their brilliance.

    • synae[he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Hammond chose the cheapest contract bid for his computer system needs, choosing a contracting/consulting agency in Cambridge MA. Nedry worked for them and was responsible for fulfilling the contract. He complains about not getting paid enough personally and I doubt there was further room in the contract budget for more headcount.

      Again, this was because Hammond went cheap on the contract. This is just one instance where he is repeatedly shown to be a cheapskate throughout the movie.