Wrote a new blog today about how much setting should go in a rulebook. It’s different for every game, but I feel a lot of games put too much lore in with the rules.

I know it’s really hip to have your setting lean on your mechanics and vice versa, so neither works great without another, but I am more of a fan of rules that support tone and play patterns that reinforce genre more than specific settings. Probably mostly because I am not big on learning a lot about a setting before I feel good about running a game.

I also like to have lots of room to improv and make a setting my own. I know you can do that with any setting, but I just feel more confident doing that with less definition in the setting.

I could probably drop a little something more into my rulebook as a stinger to get people excited about what kind of fiction the game presents. I guess that could be interpreted as setting, or at least adjacent.

Curious about what other think about this topic.

https://infantofatocha.itch.io/chronomutants/devlog/572397/whats-a-paradox-war-anyway

  • ElfWord@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Please don’t self-promote the same link across multiple communities at once. 🫤 Feels super spammy.

    • gary_d_pryor@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sure. I’m still trying to get the lay of the land over here. In my defense, I’m not selling anything and would really like to talk about lore in rulebooks.