In Kansas, some critics questioned whether the measure would violate free speech and press rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment…

But critics of the bill, mostly Democrats, argued that the law could be interpreted broadly enough that LGBTQ+ teenagers could not access information about sexual orientation or gender identity because the legal definition of sexual conduct includes acts of “homosexuality.”

  • someone [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    6 months ago

    But critics of the bill, mostly Democrats, argued that the law could be interpreted broadly enough that LGBTQ+ teenagers could not access information about sexual orientation or gender identity because the legal definition of sexual conduct includes acts of “homosexuality.”

    Are Kansas Democrats really this stupid, or is it part of the good cop/bad cop act? Isn’t that the entire point of this bill?