He was also a libertarian techbro who thought ‘child pornography isn’t necessarily abuse’
In the US, it is illegal to possess or distribute child pornography, apparently because doing so will encourage people to sexually abuse children.
This is absurd logic. Child pornography is not necessarily abuse. Even if it was, preventing the distribution or posession of the evidence won’t make the abuse go away. We don’t arrest everyone with videotapes of murders, or make it illegal for TV stations to show people being killed.
In the sense that he actually was a “free speech absolutist” type, yeah. I think we can be pretty certain he didn’t do it himself though, otherwise the FBI would absolutely have charged him for it as they harassed him to death.
He was also a libertarian techbro who thought ‘child pornography isn’t necessarily abuse’
https://web.archive.org/web/20090719140727/http://bits.are.notabug.com/
You should probably use quote formatting to indicate that that’s a quote, because right now it looks like your words
Done, thanks
In the sense that he actually was a “free speech absolutist” type, yeah. I think we can be pretty certain he didn’t do it himself though, otherwise the FBI would absolutely have charged him for it as they harassed him to death.