GreyShuck@feddit.uk to UK Politics@feddit.ukEnglish · 9 months agoConservatives set for worst election result yet, research showswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1206arrow-down15 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1201arrow-down1external-linkConservatives set for worst election result yet, research showswww.theguardian.comGreyShuck@feddit.uk to UK Politics@feddit.ukEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square41fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarejabjoe@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·9 months agoThat why Mixed PR, or even better Ranked Mixed PR, would be an easier switch, as well a better system than pure PR.
minus-squareLogi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agoWhat is why what? There is no claim in the post you’re responding to. Only questions.
minus-squarejabjoe@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 months agoWith PR you lose local MPs. With Mixed Member PR, you keep local MPs. Using rank/score voting, improves that local representation.
That why Mixed PR, or even better Ranked Mixed PR, would be an easier switch, as well a better system than pure PR.
What is why what? There is no claim in the post you’re responding to. Only questions.
With PR you lose local MPs. With Mixed Member PR, you keep local MPs. Using rank/score voting, improves that local representation.