• mosiacmango@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    She was out of the car and crouched down alone by the passengar door when one of the cops said “its her, shes out the passenger door” and yelled at her to walk towards them. Dispatch said the same thing at the same time. As shes walking (not running) clearly unarmed towards the cops as instructed, several other cops RIGHT NEXT TO THE ONE THAT TOLD HER TO WALK TO THEM shoot her several times and kill her.

    There was controversy the same day about what happened to her. The sheriff’s department blamed her dead father, then refused to release this footage for 18 months, only doing so when sued by a journalist.

    Youre giving these violent murderers way, way, way to much credit.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      8 months ago

      How do you know which officer is giving instructions, who they are near, and who heard it?

      In the video, I see at least eight officers, at least 20m away from the vehicle in all directions.

      Who was the one that shot her?

      Is there another source you can reference explaining the details? Because there’s no way anyone could know based on the video and article.

      That said, this is about as American as a police interaction can be.

        • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          8 months ago

          Facts matter. I’m not in the position to defend anyone, as it’s hard to know exactly what happened, even after watching the video several times.

          What matters is the police killed the person they were trying to save.

          When you’re in a situation where bullets are flying from both the “'good” and “bad” guy, innocent victims can, and do, get killed. This happens more often than you’d think, and there isn’t a perfect way to end a situation like this. Everyone’s life is at risk when you’ve got a murderer in a car not willing to surrender.

          The narrative that all those officers, except for one, wanted the KIDNAP VICTIM to be shot and killed is so deranged and incomprehensible outside an American mindset.

          Let’s not lose focus here. The father who kidnapped her is ultimately the one to blame. His actions led to her death.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            8 months ago

            Let’s not lose focus here. The father who kidnapped her is ultimately the one to blame. His actions led to her death.

            This is a wild take. These cops (all of them present) are to blame for where the rounds from their firearms go.

            • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              8 months ago

              So it was the cops who woke up that day and said “I want to kill an innocent girl today”, rather than the guy who actually got up with the intention to kill his family?

              We obviously have two different perspectives, but I could never see it that way.

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                20
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Its not a binary choice and presenting it as such is manipulative. Those cops where there to do what?

                If it was to protect the populous then they failed miserably, shooting wildly into the public many times.

                If it was to save the girl then they failed completely when they murdered her.

                If it was to show everyone they are in control and had the situation in hand then they failed spectacularly when they made the whole situation into chaos.

                If it was to bring the father to justice for intending to kill his family then they failed tragically when they helped him out by killing his family for him.

                The idea that no matter what the cops do its the accused fault is so ass backwards to anyone outside of the USA. These chuckle fucks made a bad situation much worse while showing off their massive incompetence. Hell what would have happen if they all did not show up for work that day?

                • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I don’t disagree. It was a total failure on their part, but a situation like that one really had a very slim chance of success.

                  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Why did they attempt it then? I am sorry but poor choices in when to engage and how are still on the cops here.

                    All they had to do was not be so trigger happy, people need to be held responsible for the bullets that are coming out of the firearm in their hands.

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The narrative that all those officers, except for one, wanted the KIDNAP VICTIM to be shot and killed is so deranged and incomprehensible outside an American mindset.

            The idea that you have to have wanted something to happen to face consequences for it happening is going to set a lot of folks free from prison though.

            • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              The idea that you have to have wanted something to happen to face consequences for it happening is going to set a lot of folks free from prison though.

              No, because the justice system balances the sentence based on intent. Homicide, 2nd degree murder, 1st degree murder, etc.

              This is why drivers who run over pedestrians often get no jail time, while someone who plows into pedestrians on purpose goes to jail for a long time.

              You could most certainly make a case that the officers could have been negligent, which caused someone to be killed.

              • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Then why is your entire contribution to the thread a deflection of any suggestion of consequences?

                • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Really? I do think there should be accountability and consequences.

                  What degree of consequences depends, I guess, on how much animosity one might have towards law enforcement. I don’t think that’s a very balanced way of looking at things.