• Tom_Hanx_Hail_Satan@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      They do have a union. They just have zero leverage because the wnba isn’t profitable. They go on strike, lose an entire year and the owners save money. I’m not going to call the wnba a charity case for the NBA because it does have value in promoting the sport itself. That value is too abstract to put into a cba negotiation though.

    • eardon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Lol. I can just imagine all of the owners only hiring women who aren’t a part of a union after that.

      Not saying it shouldn’t happen, but there will be no shortage of women willing to sell out their fellow women for a chance to make money playing basketball.

      Capitalism, ho!

      • Tom_Hanx_Hail_Satan@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The WNBA does have a union. They WNBA also have strong ties to the NBA itself. If the WNBA tries to run with replacement players they would face backlash from the NBA players union. Because it’s essentially the same owners/management group.