• UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s a shame, but people are asking for it when they buy, and therefore support, these kind of games. If people simply refused to buy always-online games, we wouldn’t be in this mess.

      • Einar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Blaming the player goes a bit far, true.

        That said, the sad truth is that companies only react when it affects their bottom line.

        • all-knight-party@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Well, there’s the other route. If they are forced legally to comply, which is what Ross is trying to get done, and is the far better option alongside being more expensive and difficult, because a company’s reaction to finances can be reversed as soon as it doesn’t matter or the public forgets.

      • jyoskykid@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        It is general knowledge that these companies do this. FSF has campaigned a lot against DRM, under the name Defective by Design.

        When someone makes a contract with the devil and complains when it affects them, pointing it out is not victim blaming.