• WhatsThePoint@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Every central bank system is a perpetual debt machine. It’s why the founding fathers specifically fought against them being established here. If you print the money then loan it to a government, how does the government pay that interest? Central bank loans the government $100 at 1% interest, even if they spend none of it, how do they pay the 1% when the issuer of the currency is also the loaner? Governments have to continue to accumulate debt in this system. They have always been a perpetual and compounding debt system.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      The founding fathers also kept slaves and didn’t let women vote. I’m tired of how Americans deify them, I suggest citing economists as authorities on economics instead of 18th century wealthy landowners.

      • WhatsThePoint@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m not deifying them by mentioning something they got right. I’m tired of people’s all or nothing lack of nuance. Humanity would be nowhere without the advancements of flawed people from the past. We can’t use our measuring stick on their lives without a huge degree of hypocrisy considering how much society has changed even in the last half century. For all their short comings, the founding fathers did create the frame work that most modern democracies are built on and ushered humanity away from monarchy.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Most modern democracies are parliamentary, actually. The US system has not been widely mimicked aside from cherry-picking a few specific details.

          Also, monarchy and democracy are not mutually exclusive. I’m Canadian, for example, which is a democratic constitutional monarchy. We still have a king but we elect our government.

          • scoobford
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes, but your king is basically a mascot. If they had any actual power, your system would be less democratic basically by definition.

            • FaceDeer@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Sure, but that’s adding quibbles beyond the scope of what I was responding to. We’re a democracy and we still have a monarch.

    • treadful
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Central bank loans the government $100 at 1% interest, even if they spend none of it, how do they pay the 1% when the issuer of the currency is also the loaner?

      Taxes.

      • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Pretty sure they’re saying if we taxes everyone 100%… Collected all the money from everyone in the country, then gave it all back to the central bank we borrowed it from originally, we’d still owe the interest on the debt… With no more money in the system where would we get the “taxes”?

        • treadful
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          As with most debt, it can’t be paid off immediately or it wouldn’t have been debt to being with. It’s a bet on the future.