• cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It really should have to pass some form of nonpartisan review before being able to be introduced. I hate that as a private citizen, I have to track possible legislation and make time during the day to tell them that it’s clearly unconstitutional, have them pass it anyways, and then wait between 2-10 years for the courts to tell them (maybe).

    • gdog05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Informally, I believe this has been resolved by having the state attorney general sign off on most legislation as to its constitutionality. In my state, the attorney general is a shitheel. But, he has called out anti-gay legislation as blatantly unconstitutional and a waste of time and money. The lawmakers want headlines and ALEC money. They don’t give two shits about it being lawful or costly or harmful.

        • gdog05@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 months ago

          If I insinuated they could block it, that wasn’t my intention. It is basically a check without teeth. They can make a stink about it and a recommendation to the governor before signing but they have no legislative power.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      some form of nonpartisan review

      Putting the legislation in front of my nonpartisan review board of Federalist Society Judges, Corporate Board Members, and Silicon Valley AI machines.