The dust line thinneth but never gone.

    • call_me_xale
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Furthermore, it’s “Zeno’s Paradox”, (as in, attributed to Zeno) not “The Zeno Paradox”

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Could also be related to the Zima paradox: nobody wants to drink it, somebody keeps buying it but it still won’t disappear from the shelves despite taking a decade off from production.

  • 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s also an example of calculus because the amount of dust approaches zero, but is never quite zero

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    What makes Zeno’s paradox a paradox is that, despite the logical requirement that moving objects must cover an infinite number of sub-intervals in order to do so, we do, in fact, observe objects move.

    But we never observe that final bit of dust getting successfully swept up, so in that case the paradox is averted.