• lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Irrelevant. Read again, except this time more closely.

    What matters is who changed first.

    Democrats.

    Democrats changed first.

    As, in recent history preceding the great ideological shifts of party banners, they always do.

    • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      but they haven’t changed, and if they want my vote at this point, after the shit they pulled, they basically need to go down on me.

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      in recent history preceding the great ideological shifts of party banners

      How old are you?

      A lot of us consider 1994 to be pretty recent but maybe not to the younger crowd

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Does it really matter to the point being made?

        Oh man, how far we’ve come in 30 years. I really am quite proud of the Democratic party.

        On the flipside, Republicans have if anything continued to regress.

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          Does it really matter to the point being made?

          Idk? What point is being made? That Democrats took a modest aesthetic step toward fixing a problem they helped create? A problem that runs much deeper than the scheduling of drugs and a problem that destroyed entire communities of color?

          I’m not interested in engaging in a debate with you, I just think it’s important to recognize the depth of the issues being discussed and be skeptical of the accomplishments being touted during an election year.

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Being the sole gateway through which Marijuana legalization has occurred is a, “modest aesthetic”?

            LOL.

            Of course you’re not interested, because you know you’ve got nothing. And yet, here you are.

            • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              7 months ago

              Being the sole gateway through which Marijuana legalization has occurred is a, “modest aesthetic”?

              What an incredibly shallow understanding of a deeply impactful issue.

              • lennybird@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                My thoughts exactly.

                But then really, what more is there to get?

                • We’re in a thread about a concern-troll criticizing Biden for not doing MORE on Marijuana decriminalization.
                • I point to the fact that literally all Marijuana legalization efforts have stemmed from Democrats.
                • And since we know Republicans will do nothing on this and in fact take us backwards in most cases, there really isn’t a further point to be made.
                • Thus, within the given context, calling Democrats’ action on Marijuan legalization, decriminalization, and outright pardoning of offenders a “modest aesthetic” is gross euphemism.
                • It is, of course, conveniently never enough with folks; and to that I point to the famed adage, “never left perfection get in the way of progress.”
                • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Biden hasn’t done enough, though. For the amount of damage criminalization has done, tossing out a few pardons does comparatively nothing for those lives ruined by being pressured into pleas under threats of federal criminal possession charges, the lives of children who went without their fathers and entire neighborhoods destroyed by over policing, all of which was caused by laws Biden himself wrote and sponsored. Especially when he has opposed legalization legislation proposed by his own party

                  But that’s ‘not relevant’ to someone who’s only point is essentially “it’s better than Republicans 🤷‍♂️”

                  • lennybird@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    Biden can’t do more. History aside, he has shifted his stance since. However, he is not a dictator.

                    The solution is pretty simple, really: Vote Democrat; vote out Republicans — then watch Biden be able to pass what has already been introduced by Democrats.

                    So yes, it really is as simple as, “Democrats are FAR better than Republicans.”

                    After all, when it comes to decriminalization, I can now smoke weed if I want to — thank a Democratic liberal.

      • OftenWrong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Asking how old someone is completely defeats the purpose. We’ve seen how boomers mishandled things and pulled the ladders up behind them so let’s not pretend that being old and remembering 1994 “like it was pretty recent” (it wasn’t) makes your opinion in any way superior.

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s relevant and recent when the majority of the legislators who passed the law are still in congress

          We’ve seen how boomers mishandled things and pulled the ladders up behind them

          That’s exactly my point. We’re still living in the reality of laws passed by boomers - hell, we’re still being governed by them. That reality doesn’t just go away when the boomers acknowledge they fucked it up, they have to actually fix their shit.