• TypicalHog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m not for banning shit. I am for educating. We need to show people what TikTok really is, what it does and how it affects shit.

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The problem, from the government’s perspective, is that there’s no way to only see some of the fnords. If we teach people to recognize Chinese propaganda, they’ll start to recognize American propaganda too. Better to keep us stupid and then control who’s allowed to talk to us in the first place.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ah fuck it, its just the next step the US is just mad China got this privacy invader and not them. Meanwhile Meta is the internet to most of Africa.

      All major social medias have been toxic and invasive and only now does it matter to the US.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not about privacy. China and the US have all the data on you they could want. It’s about control. TikTok has successfully activated their base to contact their representatives with a notification from the app. It shows that they could use it to influence our politics.

        China recognizes the danger, hence all western apps being banned. If they recognize the danger, then they must also recognize the utility. Are they using it? It’s hard to say, but TikTok is what that would look like.

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You mean like how rideshare apps told their users to vote in specific ways on specific ballot proposals? No talk about banning those apps.

          • Cethin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sure, but as far as I’m aware they’re American companies. Americans are allowed to influence our elections. Foreign agents are not. Whether they’re doing it on behalf of China or not, they’re foreign agents with a lot of political power, and have been shown to use it for their own self interest.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Billionaires might as well be considered foreign agents. They’re parasites who are doing a lot more damage to the country than any actual foreign agent has ever managed.

    • MehBlah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make them drink. Many lack the complexity of thought to understand they are being played like fiddles.