The Supreme Court on Thursday appeared skeptical of a ruling by a federal appeals court that rejected former President Donald Trump’s claim that he has absolute immunity from criminal charges based on his official acts as president. During more than two-and-a-half hours of oral argument, some of the
I mean obvi we won’t know until we know but it’s not like they’ve been difficult to read at any stage of this hearing and other past cases they’ve taken.
Well it is rare to hear such a legal expert weight that he can read the minds of the courts. Based on the prior cases, they have been all over the place. The court isn’t evenly divided on each case.
It’s not really surprising how each justice will vote. They’re not good at masking their stance based on the questions they ask.
You won’t know until they vote and give their written opinion. The devil is in the details.
I mean obvi we won’t know until we know but it’s not like they’ve been difficult to read at any stage of this hearing and other past cases they’ve taken.
Well it is rare to hear such a legal expert weight that he can read the minds of the courts. Based on the prior cases, they have been all over the place. The court isn’t evenly divided on each case.
Clearly you didn’t read the first line of the comment you’re replying to. I would expect better from a mod.
I would expect someone to read what they actually say before making snide remarks.
deleted by creator
I quoted you.
I wasn’t talking about the quote block, are you reading our thread?