• Krono@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I agree primaries are a great way to influence candidates.

    That’s probably why the Democratic party effectively cancelled them this year.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Really? They cancelled local primaries? That’s news to me.

      Or do you just mean that they didn’t have a significant primary for a sitting party candidate for President, just like pretty much every candidate in history in that same position for any party?

      I too would have liked a serious primary for this year, but that would have been a significant exception, not the rule.

      The only way it really would have happened is if Biden decided not to run at all.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Can you explain how the Democratic party “effectively cancelled” primaries this year? I guess I’m wondering what I voted on back in March if it wasn’t the Democratic primary ballot