• Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sounds like if they had no good faith intention of even testing the water block they should have done the morally correct thing and told billet they’re not going to review it. But doing that when they’ve already looked at it would be a waste of content yeah and they want a return on every dollar and second spent.

    • RogueBanana
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dont even care about the shitty review part tbh, it was a dick move but its somewhat excusable. But to actually sell a single best prototype they had staright to public where a big company can swoop it and make it their product… That was the trigger point for me and the only defense they can come up with is charity and compensation? Man all you had to do was apologize but how do u fuck it up that bad.

      • Rubanski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aren’t they legally able to get it back? It’s basically selling off stolen goods, isn’t it?

        • RogueBanana
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I doub’t if they could go up against a company as big as lmg through legal process especially if its a prototype without any patents. All they can hope for is they would at least give some monetary compensation. Just read the story about Madison as well, man I wish I never watched ltt in the first place.