The company is apparently awaiting regulatory approval.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1015 days ago

    Love the idea of Tesla, getting charged for full usage of the battery that I already bought? Yeah bite me.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    715 days ago

    Looking forward to the lawsuits on this going forward.

    Not really sure how you’ve bought a car if they can paywall physical features. otherwise folks should ask for pay for hauling /storing “tesla’s” extra batteries around

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    515 days ago

    At some point, my car is going to be a skateboard. These shitty subscriptions that companies are rolling out can bite me.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    215 days ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Pending “regulatory approval,” he wrote that the company will unlock another 40–60 miles of total range, depending on which battery Model Y owners have, “for $1,500 to $2,000.”

    The company revealed back in 2016 that the 70kWh battery in the Model S 70 actually had 75kWh of capacity that customers could pay more than $3,000 to access.

    The auto industry, in general, has been trending toward controlling access to cars’ existing features with pay-to-remove software locks.

    Mercedes-Benz charged the same amount, but annually, to improve the horsepower and torque of the EQE and EQS.

    BMW once paywalled software-locked CarPlay and, later, heated seats (the company later dropped that plan).

    And of course, Tesla has proven itself willing to remotely disable paid-for features when one of its cars is resold.


    The original article contains 250 words, the summary contains 129 words. Saved 48%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!