I have been reading the English translations and the characters and especially their dialogues feel very fake. I do appreciate the hard science aspect of the books but the long monologues, kids speaking like middle-aged philosophers, and army personnel being one-dimensional macho men breaks the immersion for me. It has the depth of a 1980s low-budget thriller.

I don’t read a lot of hard science fiction or translations of Chinese books. I don’t know if this is genre-related.

  • Eq0@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I personally had a bigger problem with the science… I am a scientist and I worked on chaos and the three body problem, there are many elements in there that just killed my immersion by being wrong. One of them was the mathematician that was computing the solution to the three body problem. No sane person would consider that worthwhile! Chaos means sensitive dependence on initial conditions. Between other things, that means that any error you are making is going to be exponentially magnified in finite time. So if you only considered 3 digits of accuracy in your solution, you can just throw your solution away after a couple of time steps. But if you considered 30 digits of accuracy? well… you only get one or two extra time steps in which you solution still makes a little bit of sense! Check out this youtube video on the double pendulum, another well-known chaotic system, to get a feeling: https://youtu.be/ldnEHycw40E
    Still talking about math, when the “the baby problem” planet is kicked away from the two-stars system, likely it would not be able to ever come back. Assuming the planet never actually leaves the solar system is quite a large assumption.

    • Reader9@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This kind of debunking is much appreciated! And doesn’t detract from my enjoyment of the book (and it’s sequels).

      You must have a high bar for science fiction as a scientist, do you have any recommendations tangential to this book? Thanks.

      • Eq0@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tangential to TTBP I’d say “children of time”. Something about the writing style put me a bit off, but the story is great. It’s very plot oriented, with a saga that spans centuries without feeling drawn out. The characters, while being a bit simple, are compelling and believable. It relates to TTBP because it also talks about two competing civilizations/planets.

        Without restrictions, the hardest sci-fi that I utterly enjoyed was Anathem. It plays with physics, in particular quantum mechanics, with such mastery it’s hard not to believe the conclusions he draws. And in the meantime he plays with a lot of other concepts as well. As many of the books of the same author, it tends to put too many concepts together, but it’s worth the ride.

        • Eq0@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          How did I forget Dune?? I thought about how to answer your question for a day, then forgot half the answer.

          Dune is absolutely great! The science is spot on, the writing sucks you in, the characters are so appealing, each with their motivation and ideologies. Everything is just amazing. It builds a whole galaxy by looking at only a handful if characters, all on the same small planet. It’s still revolutionary, in particular its focus on ecological terrorism is extremely modern.

  • oolong@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I loved this series but I consider the characters as a vehicle for the ideas. It’s not really a character-driven work; the author is more interested in how humanity as a whole would react to his fictional scenario than he is with writing characters with depth. I wouldn’t necessarily say it’s related to the genre but there are a lot of examples of this type of writing in science fiction. I also loved Dune but I feel the same way about its characters to some extent.

    • Reader9@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      the author is more interested in how humanity as a whole would react to his fictional scenario than he is with writing characters with depth

      This was my impression as well and I think it works only because the fictional scenarios are extremely creative along with sometimes gratuitous science-fiction details from the author’s imagination. And even though most characters seemed unrealistic as people I still liked them as characters and found them memorable.

      I also read (listened to) Voyagers by Ben Bova recently and while the fictional scenario was interesting, the character development leaned heavily on the relationship between the hero scientist and the promiscuous young scientist, a writing style which I found more boring.