mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoFCC explicitly prohibits fast lanes, closing possible net neutrality loopholearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square112fedilinkarrow-up11.05Karrow-down12cross-posted to: [email protected]technology
arrow-up11.05Karrow-down1external-linkFCC explicitly prohibits fast lanes, closing possible net neutrality loopholearstechnica.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square112fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]technology
minus-squarexenspideylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down23·8 months agoIf it was the status quo then why have rules?
minus-squareKraiden@kbin.runlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·8 months agoTo. Protect. It. You really have no idea what you’re talking about, do you?
minus-squareGeneralVincent@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·8 months agoBecause companies like to make money by breaking the status quo when there aren’t any rules. It’s the thing they like to do most honestly, and why we need to make rules when we see open loopholes
If it was the status quo then why have rules?
To. Protect. It.
You really have no idea what you’re talking about, do you?
Because companies like to make money by breaking the status quo when there aren’t any rules.
It’s the thing they like to do most honestly, and why we need to make rules when we see open loopholes
deleted by creator
Jfjcjejusjx