• TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    6 months ago

    JP is literally the stereotypical dilettante that he says is miserable in his book. It’s probably why he is so familiar with the topic, it’s a self help book for himself. If you have ever seen any of his live streams, the man literally keeps a dirty office.

    That said, all JP has inspired is school shootings and pressuring for sex, he is no comparison to the man around whom both the 20th and 21st century revolves.

  • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    6 months ago

    It used to be that reading the work of someone before you criticized them was considered a requirement. Now anybody can become an anti-Marxist without reading a single word he wrote.

    • Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      6 months ago

      This reminded me of his debate with Zizek. He couldn’t be assed to do more than skim the Manifesto to critique Marx

      • VILenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        6 months ago

        This phenomenon, I think, is due to a campaign of obfuscation and a continual attack on the meaning and substance behind these things.

        These concrete terms and concepts have been reduced to vague inclinations and undefined and fundamentally nebulous and ungraspable phenomena. Instead of critiquing solid beliefs and ideas accompanied by a rigorous body of academic work, you are now critiquing and defending a “feeling”. A constant, all-encompassing and omnipresent feeling, but a feeling nonetheless. And arguments about feelings don’t have anything to do with academics. All you have to do is argue from some inherent, innate knowledge that you know you must possess because doing the reading is too much work, even as you spend hours a day posting screeds about Chinese cum machines on twitter. This is why debate has been reduced to such an uneducated joke that it can scarcely still be called debate. “Marxism” and “capitalism” - these terms have been robbed of their meaning and therefore any debate can only be devoid of intellectual vigor. How many anticommunist can name a single Marxist concept and form a coherent critique? You’d be hard pressed to find one that doesn’t just go on a meaningless tirade about 1984. This is the result of decades of American anti-intellectualism. Now we have to live in a world where the aesthetics of intellectual meaning are still there but the thing itself is dead.

        Obviously, meaningful discussions occur every day. But about Marxism and in a mainstream setting? Forget about it.

        • Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean, that’s the work of propaganda. An anticommunist hardly knows what they stand against; and yet they will attack communism, even without knowledge of its terms, inner workings and intellectual history. I agree with you, but I think this phenomenon refers more broadly to the effects of anticommunist propaganda on the peoples of Earth, rather than only the American people. Anti-intelectualism in only part of it. The Americans were only more brutally affected by it, being at the seat of the Empire and all.

          Not really arguing anything; I guess I just wanted to rant for a bit.

    • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 months ago

      Meanwhile, the dweebs who follow Peterson will of course insist that you read every word he ever wrote and watch his 2700 hours of youtube content before you’re allowed to express any opinion on their doctor daddy.

      It’s very convenient.

  • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    6 months ago

    Why one of the most influential thinkers in history should have anachronistically taken the advice of a pill popping grifter who’s intellectual contribution has been to make dudes even worse. Peterson has got to be one of the laziest motherfuckers in the public sphere.

  • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    6 months ago

    Hey Jordan

    Have you fixed the world yet? No? Cleaned your room yet? No?

    Then fuck off and stop telling a real political scientist who actually inspired revolutions and actually changed the world how to do his job.

    Marx literally inspired the Soviets, who in turn got the first human into space. He fucking changed the world and you aren’t worth the shit on his boots.

  • Wertheimer [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    6 months ago

    HENRIETTA MARX: where do you think you’re going

    KARL MARX: to my room

    to write more poems for Jenny von Westphalen

    HENRIETTA MARX: well while you’re up there

    you might as well clean the room if you’re going to be doing poems in it

    KARL MARX: i’ll do it LATER

    HENRIETTA MARX: i left the cleaning supplies outside your door

    you’ll do it now

    KARL MARX: wow mom

    it’s the MEANS of production

    not the CRUELS of production

    https://the-toast.net/2015/08/18/dirtbag-karl-marx/

  • EelBolshevikism [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    tbqh the entire concept is kind of ableist. like unironically. people with adhd or various forms of neurodivergency find it much harder to focus on repetitive daily tasks like cleanliness than abstract, constantly important-feeling matters like the state of the world. and in many ways changing the world makes it literally easier for those people to clean their room. (fixing med shortage for adhd people = more adhd people cleaning their rooms)

    • Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why is the room getting dirty?
      Maybe one can have some control over the means or forces of dirt production?

      ^^I’ve not read Marx, so this is may just be world salad based on my understanding from random vids n short articles^^

      Tho, I do think that if the dust accumulation is serious, the specific reason should be found out.

  • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 months ago

    I thought this had to be fake, but nope. https://catalyst.independent.org/2024/04/30/karl-marx-needed-jordan-peterson/

    He was lazy but greedy, always begging for money from family and friends who feared for his happiness and sanity.

    lol

    He was so self-centered one wonders if he was on the spectrum.

    Nice ableism, fuck off.

    Who are Catalyst and the Independent Institute behind it, you ask? Answer: a ”libertarian think tank” that has taken money from Koch (of course), published climate change denialism, and once ran an anti-antitrust ad in the Washington Post and New York Times that was sponsored by Microsoft.

    https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/fighting-climate-chaos/climate-deniers/front-groups/independent-institute/

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_Institute