• Gorroth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I switched to Duckduckgo recently. So far it works good and gives me helpful results. Can’t give long time Test results, using it since a week. But I think it gets the job done.

    • zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was very happy am that Apple added it as a default option in iOS. I had been using it off and on for years but now it’s been my default in various browsers for I guess about 3-4 years. Generally I find what I want with no problem, but still need to append !g and get the results from Google for some searches. Maybe about 10%, and more often on image searches.

      • Gorroth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is really good to hear! I also added it as default search engine in safari and brave since I switched. Thought I have to go full in in order to give it a chance. Where exactly do you add the „!g“?

        • Almighty5617@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The “!g” is part of something called “bangs” on DuckDuckGo. Bangs are prefixes to redirect your query to another search engine. For example “!g How to pet a cat” will redirect you to Google, searching for “How to pet a cat”

          Other useful bangs are “!m” for maps, “!gi” for Google images, “!so” for stack overflow.

          You can find more about it at the bangs page: https://duckduckgo.com/bangs

    • ScoobyDoo27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve used DuckDuckGo solely for years now and have never felt like I couldn’t find what I was after.

    • Danatronic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same, I’ve never found it to be significantly worse than google except in AI-aided features like Reverse Image Search.