⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agoHuh? It's not that bigaussie.zoneimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1277arrow-down113
arrow-up1264arrow-down1imageHuh? It's not that bigaussie.zone⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-squaretate@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up50arrow-down1·2 months agoRemember that the volume goes like radius cubed. That image suggests about four times the radius. That means 64 times the volume. It’s not as simple though, as saying it has 64 times the mass. That’s… complicated.
minus-squareqjkxbmwvz@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up46·2 months ago14.5 M⊕ (earth masses) to save you a search.
minus-squarelars@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoNifty Unicode support is the only thing we like about the future
minus-squareRecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down1·2 months agoI hate when people say “twice as big” that they usually mean diameter. That crap doesn’t even make sense for circles.
minus-square⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·2 months agoI suppose volume is the best measurement of “big”
Remember that the volume goes like radius cubed. That image suggests about four times the radius. That means 64 times the volume. It’s not as simple though, as saying it has 64 times the mass. That’s… complicated.
14.5 M⊕ (earth masses) to save you a search.
Nifty Unicode support is the only thing we like about the future
✨️ density ✨️
I hate when people say “twice as big” that they usually mean diameter. That crap doesn’t even make sense for circles.
I suppose volume is the best measurement of “big”