• EmoThugInMyPhase [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    20 years doesn’t really seem that big of a deal compared to the consequences of climate chsnge. But in the US, it will actually take 60 years and then abandoned half way because 25 contractors were revealed to be fictitious companies and the 5 real ones demand a $150 billion screwdriver

    • radiofreeval [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      20 years is a big deal because climate change is exponential and we don’t have that much time, many places in 2044 won’t be habitable anymore. Nuclear is a good option but it can’t be the only option.