- cross-posted to:
- globalnews
- cross-posted to:
- globalnews
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/1554654
Archived version: https://archive.ph/VQN5X
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230817101801/https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-defense-change-of-plan-nato-spending/
deleted by creator
Danke Lindner.
So not actually libertarian, and in fact far closer to neoliberal.
You are right
Why shouldn’t it include VAT?
deleted by creator
because if the government spends 100€ on whatever, it gets 19€ back.
So it only actually spent 81€.deleted by creator
I would not call that a U-turn:
Instead, the government pledges to meet the 2 percent target on average over a five-year period, as already set out in the recently published National Security Strategy.
Seems more like the same direction, just on a parallel lane.
On the one hand debatable, as it doesn’t come 100% in line with the wording of the NATO guideline. On the other hand a practical course to measure across 5 years, as in some years there are larger procurements required than in others and overall the 2% are still met.
Politico = Axel Springer
They always put a divisive spin on it. It’s the German equivalent of Murdoch.
Atlantik-Brücke much?
What’s going on in Germany regarding war and the army? It seems that when it comes to Ukraine help, EU defense or its own army you get an info one day and retract a few days later.
This article is from a bullshit magazine, its actually 2% over 5 years, so not a real change
Yes, this just allows them to spend more in some year and less in another instead of having to budget to a very specific point each year.
The authoritarian pro military industrial complex block on lemmy is obviously not happy about this