• Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    6 months ago

    You do give consent. If you didn’t you wouldn’t be using Windows.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Say I buy a tomato. Tomato is sold to me as tomato, grown in a green house. It’s a good tomato.

      I bring it home and I cut into it to make salsa and find a razor blade. I didn’t see any markings on the outside. I don’t know how it got there.

      I go back to the store and say, “Dude, what the fuck is up with the razor blade?!”

      They say, “Oh, we noticed a lot of people buying tomatoes to cut them so we decided to include a razor blade! You’re welcome!”

      I say, “But I don’t want a razor blade. I just want the tomato!”

      They say, “Oh…that’s too bad. We think you’ll really like the razer blade.”

      I say, “I don’t care. I want a tomato without razor blades.”

      They say, “ok. Just make sure you present this very specific, very distinct bar code to the check out person.”

      I go and buy another tomato, present the barcode.

      I bring it home and it has a different type of blade inside it.

      I go back to the store and they say, “Well, you opted out of blade model a. This is blade model b.”

      I consented to buy a tomato. Not to buy a razer blade.

      I consented to install Windows OS, not fucking copilot, Cortana, Xbox central, etc.

      I should have full control over my OS, regardless of who makes it. Even Ubuntu Linux had some sketchy adware that had to be removed (this was like Ubuntu 18 or something can’t remember).

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        True, I didn’t say it wasn’t a problem. I just said legally that’s how it works.

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      Most people are too tech illiterate to understand it all. I doubt people would agree to such a level of data collection, if they knew more about it. I believe it can be compared to making illiterate people sign a contract, when they can’t even read it.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well they agreed to it. It isn’t a great reality but its the one we live in.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah this reminds me of the time I argued with a guy who stood firmly by the opinion that because Facebook has terms of service that people agreed to, there was nothing wrong or unethical about Facebook business practices and everyone who used it deserved what they got

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        It a lot of ways that’s correct. However, I think the issue is the status quo

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            6 months ago

            I don’t use Facebook or any other privacy invading service. My point was that part of the issue is people being lazy and not caring about the terrible things in the terms of service they totally bothered to read.