• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    6 months ago

    … while still opposing estate taxes. It’s fucking amazing the lengths Americans will go to to avoid actually solving a problem.

    • psvrh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      6 months ago

      No kidding.

      This is like healthcare, which every other nation has mostly solved, but the Americans bend over backwards to find the most byzantine “solutions “ for just to avoid taxing the rich and/or implementing a functioning welfare state.

      The latest hysterical example was importing drugs from Canadian pharmacies because apparently buying from a (barely) socialist country is okay, but basic bargaining is somehow immoral.

      • Noodle07@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Don’t forget that paying taxes to help others while they don’t necessarily benefit from it horrify most of them

  • andyburke@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Oh yes, let’s do another special loophole kinda bullshit thing instead of restraining capitalism, breaking up monopolies and providing for the social good.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Can’t wait to read the headlines in 20 years:

    “My 401Kids account was hacked and now I start with nothing”

    And

    “Dad uses 401Kids account used for hookers and blow”

    And

    "Buy now, save later, 401Kids account available for lay-by purchases "

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      Also:

      “Need money now? Get a low* interest loan using only your child’s 401Kids as collateral! Turn that theoretical money into actual money!”

      *And you better not miss a payment, you fucking deadbeat.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      “hey, it’s your 18 birthday: hot single women in your area want to help you celebrate. Just send $53,000 to book your cabin on our exclusive birthday extravaganza cruise!”

  • satanmat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 months ago

    All families would be eligible to contribute up to $2,500 per year.

    Most of us don’t have $2500 per year to save !!!

    • scoobford
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s good, it means the cap won’t restrict what you can save for your children.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      You are not required to contribute the maximum. Some of the programs only required $5 for an count. Saving some, even a little, is better than saving nothing.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        But it doesn’t do anything about inequality. Rich kids will have an even bigger tax shelter to retire on while poor kids will have nothing. This is a tax break for the wealthy.

      • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s the point the poor kids stay poor and the rich kids stay rich. How does this solve the issue it’s trying to fix?

  • fiat_lux@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    It starts before birth. Low socio-economic status affects the health of pregnant people, which in turn has consequences for foetal development. Stress is a big trigger for various latent congenital issues, and that’s one reason climate change is going to result in increased rates of disease.