There is no way to vote against a candidate. You canāt mark the bubble āanybody but trumpā, or āI wish the democrats had run anyone elseā.
Sure you can. I just explained how.
A vote for Biden is a vote in support of Biden, not a vote against trump. Thatās how itāll be counted.
This is just semantics.
Support for Biden incorporates support for the genocide he supplies and denies the existence of.
And lack of support for Biden incorporates support for genocide that Trump will continue and excelerate, in addition to the death and other harm that will come to minorities in the U.S., as well as the potential end of what little democracy we have.
Itās a catch 22, and youāre choosing the worst option.
You probably donāt want to invoke the imagery of blood on oneās hands when youāre advocating for Biden.
Blood is on the hands of every taxpayer. Iām strategically voting to reduce that amount of blood. Youāre doing nothing to reduce it, and potentially increasing it.
Thereās some really flawed reasoning going into your ideas here. Iām gonna go way out on some limbs and try to enumerate the different stuff that seems to underpin your ideas, but if I get something wrong feel free to lay it out.
If youāre considering any vote that isnāt for trump to be against trump than my psl ballot is against trump too and voting āagainstā trump is a meaningless distinction.
If only a vote for a candidate that has a chance at beating trump counts as a vote against him then unless the polls change somehow your Biden vote isnāt a vote āagainstā trump.
If youāre suggesting that only a vote for the candidate who has the best chance to beat trump counts as a vote against trump, youāre discounting the fact that Biden doesnāt have to be that candidate. He could still step down or not be selected at the convention.
It is not semantics to be clear about how the electoral system works. Votes are for candidates, not against them. Itās important to recognize that because parties will look at vote totals to see what is acceptable political action, messaging, etc.
Thatās not semantics, itās how the system works. Itās not a semantic distinction because opposition to one candidate does not mean support for another, but voting for a candidate indicates support for them and their actions and platform.
The reason thatās important is because a person has to both pick one of the understandings of voting for Biden in opposition to trump that I laid out above (or some different one that I missed!) and accept that their vote for Biden is literally a vote in support of his aid and denial of a genocide that we see disgusting images of everyday.
The problem with waiving your hands about what trump is gonna do is that almost every American made it through trumps term. They saw how he operated and what he did. You have a hard time convincing a person that the president who didnāt do a genocide is gonna be worse than the one who is at this very moment supplying one and denying its existence at the same time.
I donāt say that to defend trump, but to illustrate how that line of thinking opens you up to some pretty straightforward critiques from a person who actually is considering voting for trump.
Thatās who you wanna convince, right? The undecided voter? How do you expect to convince someone who can remember no genocide when they compare it with the presence of a genocide?
Itās not an enviable position.
I think you have a deeply flawed and warped worldview if you would say the blood of Palestinians is on the hands of every taxpayer. Americans should be angry that a genocide is being committed in our names, but we bear no responsibility for it because despite a majority in favor of ending arms shipments and immediate ceasefire, Biden continues on.
And you would have me vote for the man who will aid and deny a genocide despite it being universally unpopular? Because the other guy is worse? The other guy who was already president just four short years ago and didnāt do what Biden is doing?
No.
We are given a chance to record our political will this November and mine wonāt be in favor of Bidens genocide.
Hey bloodfart, the only reason I can still have a job and access healthcare in a lot of places is because of Biden working to reverse Trumpās anti-trans stuff. I get that you feel all high and mighty telling people that folks like me donāt matter enough but this shit is kinda important to some of us.
If youāre considering any vote that isnāt for trump to be against trump than my psl ballot is against trump too and voting āagainstā trump is a meaningless distinction.
The only currently available candidate that stands a chance is Biden. I know you cover that in your next sentence so:
If only a vote for a candidate that has a chance at beating trump counts as a vote against him then unless the polls change somehow your Biden vote isnāt a vote āagainstā trump.
Biden has still has a chance of beating Trump. The polls are horseshit.
If youāre suggesting that only a vote for the candidate who has the best chance to beat trump counts as a vote against trump, youāre discounting the fact that Biden doesnāt have to be that candidate. He could still step down or not be selected at the convention.
If that were to happen I would be elated.
It is not semantics to be clear about how the electoral system works. Votes are for candidates, not against them. Itās important to recognize that because parties will look at vote totals to see what is acceptable political action, messaging, etc.
You can say what you like, but this is still just semantics. I understand what youāre saying is technically correct, but youāre missing the point of what is being said when somebody says they are voting against something.
Youāre ignoring the intended meaning and focusing on the technical mechanics.
and accept that their vote for Biden is literally a vote in support of his aid and denial of a genocide that we see disgusting images of everyday.
A vote for a candidate is not a blanket support for all policies and actions they make.
from a person who actually is considering voting for trump.
Then youāre an even bigger fool than you initially let on.
Thatās who you wanna convince, right? The undecided voter? How do you expect to convince someone who can remember no genocide when they compare it with the presence of a genocide?
This isnāt my job. And youāre not who Iām here to convince.
I think you have a deeply flawed and warped worldview if you would say the blood of Palestinians is on the hands of every taxpayer.
Every single tax payer is ultimately sending their money to the federal government, who then uses that money to bomb and kill Palestinians. Most states gave police training ops with the IDF.
Thatās not a warped view, those are the facts, and it means blood is on all of our hands.
despite a majority in favor of ending arms shipments and immediate ceasefire, Biden continues on.
And yet we pay our taxes, which kills Palestinians. You bear responsibility just as I. You canāt avoid that anymore than you can avoid a Trump/Biden winning.
If youād be elated that Biden stepped down or that the convention put someone else up, join me in telling everyone that they donāt have to vote for Biden. Thatās how you get the thing you want. You commit to not voting for Biden.
A vote can only ever be interpreted as blanket support for the candidateās policies and actions. You donāt get to say āi like Biden but not his border detentionsā, you get to say āBidenā. Consent to the candidates program is part of casting a vote for them and if you canāt stomach going on a permanent record as saying āI support Bidens genocideā then donāt vote for him.
I am not considering voting for trump. I decided sixteen years ago that I wouldnāt vote for Biden again and am planning on marking my ballot psl this year. As I wrote, I invoked a person considering voting for trump over Biden to illustrate how difficult it is to portray trump as a clear danger more important than an ongoing genocide.
I asked if that was who you were trying to convince because itās either undecideds, nonvoters or me and you will never convince me to vote for Biden. You said youāre not here to convince me, so who is it, undecideds, non voters or some third group?
If you really believed that the blood of innocent people was on the hands of every American due to Biden actions you wouldnāt be in here telling people to vote for him.
If you believed that you were made a genocidare by his disgusting rhetoric and material support youād be opposed to him. Youād be in the streets protesting or campaigning to end support to israel or any other number of other actions but instead youāre on the internet trying to advocate against doing the bare minimum to stop Biden policy that you say taints us all. Media can say all kinds of things about protest movements and the White House can deploy its press secretary to dodge questions about crackdown on antiwar actions but neither can deny a vote cast and counted.
Make your voice heard to them with the only device given you that canāt be manipulated or deepfaked or covered up. Vote third party this November.
join me in telling everyone that they donāt have to vote for Biden. Thatās how you get the thing you want. You commit to not voting for Biden.
The error in this is that you are relying on boomer whoās supporting genocide to do the right thing. Be a gambler all you like, Iām not going to gamble with fascism. Itās shortsighted and will get overall more people killed.
Every fucking day Bidenās campaign team sends me emails asking for donations, and they send me like 8 every day. And every time I respond with imagery of dead fucking bodies in Palestine. And do you know how theyāve responded? They fucking havenāt. They know theyāre losing votes because of this. They know theyāre losing ground because of this, because every other email from them is them complaining that they are getting out fundraised by Trump.
But they donāt even give enough of a shit to have one of their lower level lackeys from their campaign team respond. They truly do not give a shit. And youāre gonna trust them to do the right thing and step down? Youāre gonna trust genocide supporters to do the right thing?
A vote can only ever be interpreted as blanket support for the candidateās policies
Not so. A vote can be interpreted a million different ways. Itās a number, not an essay of love. It is a statement saying āof all of these choices, X is my preferenceā. Trying to decipher any more meaning of that requires more data which isnāt captured in an election.
How do you tell the difference between a voter who chose a candidate at random versus one who chose them because they were best friends? You canāt.
You donāt get to say āi like Biden but not his border detentionsā, you get to say āBidenā.
Sure you can, you just did. Youāre comparing a fully articulated thought to a vote, of course they arenāt going to match.
As I wrote, I invoked a person considering voting for trump over Biden to illustrate how difficult it is to portray trump as a clear danger more important than an ongoing genocide.
It isnāt difficult to illustrate how much larger of a danger Trump is:
You said youāre not here to convince me, so who is it, undecideds, non voters or some third group?
Anybody fence sitting.
If you really believed that the blood of innocent people was on the hands of every American due to Biden actions you wouldnāt be in here telling people to vote for him.
Why not? And it isnāt just Bidenās actions, itās pretty much every major political action the U.S. has ever taken since itās inception. And word of advice, if youāre trying to convince people, starting from a position of āyou donāt ACTUALLY believe X because you said Yā is just silly, and a waste of everyoneās time.
If you believed that you were made a genocidare by his disgusting rhetoric and material support youād be opposed to him
Iāve already explain thatās not how this works. Itās a two party system.
Youād be in the streets protesting or campaigning to end support to israel or any other number of other actions
Iām trying not to get shot by our police state and widowing my disabled wife. So yeah, fuck me I guess.
Make your voice heard to them with the only device given you that canāt be manipulated or deepfaked or covered up. Vote third party this November.
I will not be handing Trump another victory, no thank you. It was a disaster the first time we decided to botch it in 2016, itās going to be even worse this time.
you donāt believe the democrats will listen or can be pushed left. you donāt believe they have any intention of changing course and that they have accepted that theyāll lose votes because of it. you donāt believe they can be trusted to make the right choices, choices you would support.
you arenāt able to take direct action that would reflect your political beliefs and your clear eyed possession of a basic moral compass (iām right there with you, my 60 hour workweek, family obligations and employer preclude me from much more than being present at events and holding signs).
but you wonāt reflect any of that with the action you are able to take in november, denying the democrats your vote that they have already counted out. you arenāt willing to make your voice heard in the only way that they will listen to.
you posted some memes and its important to recognize that this isnāt some hypothetical or thought experiment. a sitting american president is literally aiding a genocide and denying its existence at the same time. you have the opportunity to not support that action.
you can register your dissatisfaction with that in a way that cannot be deepfaked, covered up, misinterpreted or sidelined by casting a ballot for a party whose platform is āpalestinian statehood and stop weapons shipments to israelā.
it wonāt require that you put yourself in danger or that you expose yourself to attack and it doesnāt take any more time than what you were already planning to do.
on the topic of how a vote can be interpreted, let me give you a concrete example that will hopefully help illustrate what iām saying: biden received 81,283,501 votes in 2020. was the biden campaign team able to examine, for example, vote number 12,345,678 and determine if that person genuinely believed in bidenās platform or if they were simply disgusted with trumps covid response?
of course they were not. votes are interpreted by campaigns as support. they are not able to interpret them as anything but that. thatās not because the voters genuinely support those candidates, but because the vote only contains information about support.
thatās why campaigns use a bunch of other methods to figure out what people were actually trying to express with their votes, like polls, statistical analysis and interviews, to varying degrees of accuracy.
There is no way to vote against a candidate. You canāt mark the bubble āanybody but trumpā, or āI wish the democrats had run anyone elseā.
You can only vote for candidates.
Thatās not some metaphor, itās how the system works.
A vote for Biden is a vote in support of Biden, not a vote against trump. Thatās how itāll be counted.
Support for Biden incorporates support for the genocide he supplies and denies the existence of.
I tried to figure out a polite way to say this and hereās the best I came up with:
You probably donāt want to invoke the imagery of blood on oneās hands when youāre advocating for Biden.
Sure you can. I just explained how.
This is just semantics.
And lack of support for Biden incorporates support for genocide that Trump will continue and excelerate, in addition to the death and other harm that will come to minorities in the U.S., as well as the potential end of what little democracy we have.
Itās a catch 22, and youāre choosing the worst option.
Blood is on the hands of every taxpayer. Iām strategically voting to reduce that amount of blood. Youāre doing nothing to reduce it, and potentially increasing it.
Thereās some really flawed reasoning going into your ideas here. Iām gonna go way out on some limbs and try to enumerate the different stuff that seems to underpin your ideas, but if I get something wrong feel free to lay it out.
If youāre considering any vote that isnāt for trump to be against trump than my psl ballot is against trump too and voting āagainstā trump is a meaningless distinction.
If only a vote for a candidate that has a chance at beating trump counts as a vote against him then unless the polls change somehow your Biden vote isnāt a vote āagainstā trump.
If youāre suggesting that only a vote for the candidate who has the best chance to beat trump counts as a vote against trump, youāre discounting the fact that Biden doesnāt have to be that candidate. He could still step down or not be selected at the convention.
It is not semantics to be clear about how the electoral system works. Votes are for candidates, not against them. Itās important to recognize that because parties will look at vote totals to see what is acceptable political action, messaging, etc.
Thatās not semantics, itās how the system works. Itās not a semantic distinction because opposition to one candidate does not mean support for another, but voting for a candidate indicates support for them and their actions and platform.
The reason thatās important is because a person has to both pick one of the understandings of voting for Biden in opposition to trump that I laid out above (or some different one that I missed!) and accept that their vote for Biden is literally a vote in support of his aid and denial of a genocide that we see disgusting images of everyday.
The problem with waiving your hands about what trump is gonna do is that almost every American made it through trumps term. They saw how he operated and what he did. You have a hard time convincing a person that the president who didnāt do a genocide is gonna be worse than the one who is at this very moment supplying one and denying its existence at the same time.
I donāt say that to defend trump, but to illustrate how that line of thinking opens you up to some pretty straightforward critiques from a person who actually is considering voting for trump.
Thatās who you wanna convince, right? The undecided voter? How do you expect to convince someone who can remember no genocide when they compare it with the presence of a genocide?
Itās not an enviable position.
I think you have a deeply flawed and warped worldview if you would say the blood of Palestinians is on the hands of every taxpayer. Americans should be angry that a genocide is being committed in our names, but we bear no responsibility for it because despite a majority in favor of ending arms shipments and immediate ceasefire, Biden continues on.
And you would have me vote for the man who will aid and deny a genocide despite it being universally unpopular? Because the other guy is worse? The other guy who was already president just four short years ago and didnāt do what Biden is doing?
No.
We are given a chance to record our political will this November and mine wonāt be in favor of Bidens genocide.
Hey bloodfart, the only reason I can still have a job and access healthcare in a lot of places is because of Biden working to reverse Trumpās anti-trans stuff. I get that you feel all high and mighty telling people that folks like me donāt matter enough but this shit is kinda important to some of us.
Theres a story I like called the ones who walk away from omelas. Itās pretty good.
The only currently available candidate that stands a chance is Biden. I know you cover that in your next sentence so:
Biden has still has a chance of beating Trump. The polls are horseshit.
If that were to happen I would be elated.
You can say what you like, but this is still just semantics. I understand what youāre saying is technically correct, but youāre missing the point of what is being said when somebody says they are voting against something.
Youāre ignoring the intended meaning and focusing on the technical mechanics.
A vote for a candidate is not a blanket support for all policies and actions they make.
Then youāre an even bigger fool than you initially let on.
This isnāt my job. And youāre not who Iām here to convince.
Every single tax payer is ultimately sending their money to the federal government, who then uses that money to bomb and kill Palestinians. Most states gave police training ops with the IDF.
Thatās not a warped view, those are the facts, and it means blood is on all of our hands.
And yet we pay our taxes, which kills Palestinians. You bear responsibility just as I. You canāt avoid that anymore than you can avoid a Trump/Biden winning.
If youād be elated that Biden stepped down or that the convention put someone else up, join me in telling everyone that they donāt have to vote for Biden. Thatās how you get the thing you want. You commit to not voting for Biden.
A vote can only ever be interpreted as blanket support for the candidateās policies and actions. You donāt get to say āi like Biden but not his border detentionsā, you get to say āBidenā. Consent to the candidates program is part of casting a vote for them and if you canāt stomach going on a permanent record as saying āI support Bidens genocideā then donāt vote for him.
I am not considering voting for trump. I decided sixteen years ago that I wouldnāt vote for Biden again and am planning on marking my ballot psl this year. As I wrote, I invoked a person considering voting for trump over Biden to illustrate how difficult it is to portray trump as a clear danger more important than an ongoing genocide.
I asked if that was who you were trying to convince because itās either undecideds, nonvoters or me and you will never convince me to vote for Biden. You said youāre not here to convince me, so who is it, undecideds, non voters or some third group?
If you really believed that the blood of innocent people was on the hands of every American due to Biden actions you wouldnāt be in here telling people to vote for him.
If you believed that you were made a genocidare by his disgusting rhetoric and material support youād be opposed to him. Youād be in the streets protesting or campaigning to end support to israel or any other number of other actions but instead youāre on the internet trying to advocate against doing the bare minimum to stop Biden policy that you say taints us all. Media can say all kinds of things about protest movements and the White House can deploy its press secretary to dodge questions about crackdown on antiwar actions but neither can deny a vote cast and counted.
Make your voice heard to them with the only device given you that canāt be manipulated or deepfaked or covered up. Vote third party this November.
The error in this is that you are relying on boomer whoās supporting genocide to do the right thing. Be a gambler all you like, Iām not going to gamble with fascism. Itās shortsighted and will get overall more people killed.
Every fucking day Bidenās campaign team sends me emails asking for donations, and they send me like 8 every day. And every time I respond with imagery of dead fucking bodies in Palestine. And do you know how theyāve responded? They fucking havenāt. They know theyāre losing votes because of this. They know theyāre losing ground because of this, because every other email from them is them complaining that they are getting out fundraised by Trump.
But they donāt even give enough of a shit to have one of their lower level lackeys from their campaign team respond. They truly do not give a shit. And youāre gonna trust them to do the right thing and step down? Youāre gonna trust genocide supporters to do the right thing?
Not so. A vote can be interpreted a million different ways. Itās a number, not an essay of love. It is a statement saying āof all of these choices, X is my preferenceā. Trying to decipher any more meaning of that requires more data which isnāt captured in an election.
How do you tell the difference between a voter who chose a candidate at random versus one who chose them because they were best friends? You canāt.
Sure you can, you just did. Youāre comparing a fully articulated thought to a vote, of course they arenāt going to match.
It isnāt difficult to illustrate how much larger of a danger Trump is:
Anybody fence sitting.
Why not? And it isnāt just Bidenās actions, itās pretty much every major political action the U.S. has ever taken since itās inception. And word of advice, if youāre trying to convince people, starting from a position of āyou donāt ACTUALLY believe X because you said Yā is just silly, and a waste of everyoneās time.
Iāve already explain thatās not how this works. Itās a two party system.
Iām trying not to get shot by our police state and widowing my disabled wife. So yeah, fuck me I guess.
I will not be handing Trump another victory, no thank you. It was a disaster the first time we decided to botch it in 2016, itās going to be even worse this time.
so tell me if ive got this right:
you donāt believe the democrats will listen or can be pushed left. you donāt believe they have any intention of changing course and that they have accepted that theyāll lose votes because of it. you donāt believe they can be trusted to make the right choices, choices you would support.
you arenāt able to take direct action that would reflect your political beliefs and your clear eyed possession of a basic moral compass (iām right there with you, my 60 hour workweek, family obligations and employer preclude me from much more than being present at events and holding signs).
but you wonāt reflect any of that with the action you are able to take in november, denying the democrats your vote that they have already counted out. you arenāt willing to make your voice heard in the only way that they will listen to.
you posted some memes and its important to recognize that this isnāt some hypothetical or thought experiment. a sitting american president is literally aiding a genocide and denying its existence at the same time. you have the opportunity to not support that action.
you can register your dissatisfaction with that in a way that cannot be deepfaked, covered up, misinterpreted or sidelined by casting a ballot for a party whose platform is āpalestinian statehood and stop weapons shipments to israelā.
it wonāt require that you put yourself in danger or that you expose yourself to attack and it doesnāt take any more time than what you were already planning to do.
on the topic of how a vote can be interpreted, let me give you a concrete example that will hopefully help illustrate what iām saying: biden received 81,283,501 votes in 2020. was the biden campaign team able to examine, for example, vote number 12,345,678 and determine if that person genuinely believed in bidenās platform or if they were simply disgusted with trumps covid response?
of course they were not. votes are interpreted by campaigns as support. they are not able to interpret them as anything but that. thatās not because the voters genuinely support those candidates, but because the vote only contains information about support.
thatās why campaigns use a bunch of other methods to figure out what people were actually trying to express with their votes, like polls, statistical analysis and interviews, to varying degrees of accuracy.
deleted by creator