I’m not great at understanding a lot of the technical aspects of the different pc parts, and especially figuring out where any potential bottle necks are. I’m thinking that the gpu is my biggest issue right now, but I’d hate to spend the money and not get a huge improvement in performance.

p.s. I’m leaning towards the RX 6600 for a budget friendly upgrade, but I’d be open to other similarly priced suggestions.

Update: thanks for all of the advice y’all. I ended up spending a bit more for a 6650xt.

  • Pirky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think upgrading to a 6600 would be a good choice. That will net you a sizable jump in performance for the price. According to TechPowerUp, the 6600 is about 70% better than the 1060 6GB. If you were to upgrade anything else, I would say the power supply. Paired with the 8700 and 6600, yours will be perfectly fine. But if you were to upgrade to, say, a 3080 or above, then a beefier supply would be required.

    Edit: The 6600 only runs on 8 PCIe lanes instead of the regular 16. This isn’t an issue with newer hardware, but since your CPU doesn’t support PCIe Gen 4 speeds (only Gen 3), you may experience lower performance. Idk if it will be significant. Mostly because 8 PCIe Gen 3 lanes should be enough to not bottleneck the 6600. I believe Hardware Unboxed, Gamer’s Nexus, or another channel tested that, but I’m on mobile and don’t feel like searching for it.

    • sosodev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      AFAIK the pcie bandwidth difference from using gen 3 isn’t particularly noticeable. I’ve recently upgraded to a 6600 that I got for cheap and I would say it’s a pretty good card. The only problem is that performance varies a lot. Some games play well with it while others do not.

  • wipasoda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Besides a better gpu (look out for PCI-e gen difference) I highly recommend a higher refresh rate monitor, e.g. 144 Hz instead of 60 Hz. If you use your pc for gaming, this will make a huge difference in experience.

    Also, unless you care about a silent pc or ‘cool running’ one, I’d wait and see whether you really need to upgrade your PSU when upgrading your GPU, but don’t let it exhaust itself

    • ur_dad@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been gaming on sub 60fps for so long I don’t mind only running games at 60. The monitors were a gift from a friend and I don’t have any intent to replace them soon.

  • Vlyn
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    The RX 6600 is really nice for the price. Nvidia wise that would be a 3060 (which goes for a lot more and is actually slower at times, though also has DLSS).

    As you play at 1440p60hz it would be a really nice upgrade. Your CPU won’t hold you back at 60hz :)

    Depending on the type of games you play the 16 GB RAM might sooner or later become limiting (Absolutely zero issues with 32 GB), but it’s going to be fine for most games. Especially if you’re not a power user (like lots of browser tabs, Discord, several launchers, …).

  • CyberTaco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Since you’re looking at a budget video card, maybe have a look at some of Intel’s Arc offerings. They keep getting better and better, and the prices are great.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah honestly an Arc 750 cant be beat for the price shopping brand new at RRP but it is only an 8GB card, so it does have its limitations.

      Most of the hardware guys on YT say that the current best value card going if you want something with just a bit more memory and power is the 12gb Rx6700xt.

  • Sha'ul@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Having 2 1440’s, yes, you badly need to upgrade video card. Something like a 6800 XT, 4070 may work or might not be strong enough but 4080 is a lot of money, or 3080 Ti.

    After you buy a GPU, save up for new board and processor, your 6 cores won’t always keep up with graphics card

      • Sha'ul@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then spend every dollar you can on a video card to power the dual 1440’s. Then work towards buying a new motherboard and processor.

      • Turun@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What games do you want to play and how sensitive to low fps are you? I disagree strongly with the top level comment. The fact that you have two displays doesn’t matter and you are limited to 60Hz anyway.

        I have a 1070 for two 1440p and one 1080p monitor. But since I don’t play any demanding games I’ll wait out the Nvidia 5000 series before buying anything new.

    • Turun@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. That is not needed and also ridiculously over budget for most people.

      I have a 1070 and am very happy with my 1440 1440 1080 monitor configuration. Keep in mind that op only has 60Hz!

  • Atemu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’ll want to upgrade your “core” platform soon aswell but your current one should still be good for a few years. Really depends on what it is you’re playing though.

  • Turun@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Memory and storage are dirt cheap right now.

    But also not really needed unless you have a need for it.

  • JohnEdwa@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone who just upgraded from a setup with a GTX 1060 and a 1440p monitor to a 3060 TI - which is something like 25% faster than the RX 6600 - I would suggest getting something a bit faster if at all possible. The RX 6600 is still a pretty good card for 1080p, but the extra resolution is a bit too much with most newer games. Though if you are okay dropping to medium settings or utilizing upscaling it won’t matter as much.