tl;dr Furiosa’s $25 million opening was lower than the expected $40 million that its predecessor Fury Road opened with. Could lose money on its $168 million budget.

Lower budgeted family friendly Garfield well on its way to profit on its reported $60 million budget.

  1. “Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga,” $25.6 million.

  2. “The Garfield Movie,” $24.8 million.

  3. “IF,” $16.1 million.

  4. “Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes,” $13.4 million.

  5. “The Fall Guy,” $5.9 million.

  6. “The Strangers: Chapter 1,” $5.6 million.

  7. “Sight,” $2.7 million.”

  8. “Challengers,” $1.4 million.

  9. “Babes,” $1.1 million.

  10. “Back to Black,” $1.1 million.

  • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    In doing so completely reset the story.

    Reseting the existing timeline doesn’t mean it’s a new product or a new story. It’s the same franchise still.

    Call the film “Fury Road” staring “Mad Matt” and you’d be calling it a visionary new story with tasteful callbacks to 80s action films.

    Yes. But it’s not. It’s another sequel. (Prequel is still a continuation of a franchise)

    So many shows and movies could have been new standalone stories but have a brand tacked on because of sales and marketing bull.

    • Ptsf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lol I agree with you somewhat, but I think you’re too lost in the sauce here. There are plenty of egregious examples of Hollywood and movie studios doing what you dislike (Batman rings some bells…), but this ain’t it chief.