• NuXCOM_90Percent
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    People refuse to even let an ad play but sure, they’ll participate in the pledge drives

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Ads are not just inconvenient but very often annoying and misleading, so I can’t blame anyone for that.

      Micropayment donations might, though. It’s not annoying, not misleading, and there is a considerable amount of people even now that regularly donate/otherwise support their favorite content creators, and this would be even more convenient because it is automatic and the amount depends on how much time did you watch videos.
      And it doesn’t even necessarily depend on cryptocurrencies.

      • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        The amount of people who would pay is going to be near zero in the grand scheme of things.

        Next time you’re anywhere where you could discretely look at people’s phones, see how many of them run apps with ads. Most apps will offer very cheap IAP to remove ads, but people choose to not pay it. Vast majority of the users have already decided that their time wasted on ads are worth less than whatever tiny monetary cost it would be to remove them. Same thing here: Vast majority of the users have already decided they’re not going to pay to get rid of the ads. This in turn means due to how few people who would be willing to pay, it is not going to be nearly sufficient to keep the infrastructure required up and running, as well as keep the creators compensated for creating the content.