http://web.archive.org/web/20240512204543/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapon_design

(Archive link in case it’s changed.)

This article is a surprisingly entertaining read for a few reasons:

  • one or more people who wrote it clearly have very strong opinions about how nuclear weapons should be built
  • the article contains a surprising amount of detail, including stuff that seems like it’d be classified or at least censored
  • due to both of the above, there’s a ton of [citation needed] that I doubt will ever be resolved
  • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    i was also surpised tbh, its much more thorough about both materials and reasoning (although it could all be false). Also very strong opinions about who built first thermonuclear, with whole paragraph discussing it.