keenkoon@lemm.ee to Futurology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up1109arrow-down11cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1108arrow-down1external-linkAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.comkeenkoon@lemm.ee to Futurology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square8fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareForgetReddit@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·1 year agoThat makes sense. A person didn’t write it. An algorithm does not and should not have the same rights as a human being.
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down2·1 year agoUntil that algorithm can be a self sufficient, independent entity, that is. And we’re likely decades away from that at best.
minus-squarejmcs@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoAnd even that would require new laws. In most (all?) jurisdictions only humans or groups of humans, like corporations and associations, can own copyright.
That makes sense. A person didn’t write it. An algorithm does not and should not have the same rights as a human being.
Until that algorithm can be a self sufficient, independent entity, that is. And we’re likely decades away from that at best.
And even that would require new laws. In most (all?) jurisdictions only humans or groups of humans, like corporations and associations, can own copyright.