• tsonfeir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    29 days ago

    The maximum penalty in NY for one of those 34 felonies is 4 years in prison. So, 136 years total, if served consecutively, 4 years if he can serve them at the same time. I bet he doesn’t even get a day, or a fine he actually pays.

    • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      28 days ago

      First conviction, they’d be concurrent and highly unlikely he’d get max time. However, this is a first conviction, breaking the glass ceiling for convicting an ex president, in the weakest of the four current trials. Sentences become more likely to be jail up to minimum guaranteed imprisonment for some time, because of sentencing guidelines, as well as the terms getting longer for each conviction.

      • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        28 days ago

        We’ll find out if justice is dead, or if she was just on vacation and turned off her phone.

        • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          28 days ago

          When you are disappointed, try to remember that we want a justice system that is light on first offenders, and that most other people you wouldn’t want to get the max sentence.

          • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            28 days ago

            I think that when we are punishing a first time offender, we have to consider the motivation Behind the crime. Was it just to get rich? I think that’s something we can all understand. But was it to cover up treason? I don’t think something like that comes with any leniency.

            • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              28 days ago

              It was no different than fucking Clinton lying about getting a blowjob in office.

              Dude cheated on his wife and was trying to hide it to get elected.

              Nothing illegal about that.

              Just like with Clinton and Nixon though, it’s not the crime, it’s the coverup.

              I think you might be conflating this with the election interference case, similar but different.

                  • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    28 days ago

                    If the purpose of the crime committed is nefarious, then I think the punishment, regardless of a first time offender, should be appropriate.

                    Let’s say I’m convicted of trying to cover up hush money. If that money was used to silence someone from telling the world about me breaking the speed limit, it’s not a “big deal.”

                    But if I’m trying to cover up something big… like an act that is potentially another felony… than it’s a big deal.

                    Does that make sense?