• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 months ago

    He had the opportunity to testify if he thought any of the statements were false… he declined.

    That’s all we need to fucking say - under oath he refused to refute the charges.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It kind of does say it all, but in a criminal trial, refusing to testify cannot be held against you under the 5th Amendment. In a civil trial, though, refusing to testify can be factored into reaching a verdict.

      So yeah, while it may make you appear guilty as hell, refusing to testify in your criminal trial cannot be held against you.

      That was hammered into us every time I had to report for jury duty.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Idealistically, you’re right. But it says volumes that someone would be willing to say a lot of shit in front of a camera (where the consequences are miniscule), but refuse to say the exact same shit in front of a judge (where the consequences are serious [assuming you’re not a “rich” white orange cult leader]).

        Trump doesn’t testify for the one reason we all know: he’d incriminate himself faster than any piece of evidence that could ever be produced.

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Oh, yeah. We all know. lol. But, for better or worse, he’s entitled to the same constitutional protections as the rest of us (despite the fact he routinely wipes his ass with it).

          • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yes, it can’t impact the trial, that he didn’t testify. Doesn’t mean we can’t infer, out here away from the court, that he put up a big front in public and slunk away with his tail between his legs in court, because he knew he was guilty and would only have made things worse if he testified, along with earning some counts of perjury.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        My understanding is that it is usually idiotic to testify at one’s own criminal trial, even if innocent. Preventing Donald from testifying is one of the few intelligent things the defense did, and not just because he is a loudmouthed pathological liar who would instantly perjure himself.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        It is absolutely your right to not be sentenced or punished by the state for refusing to testify and that’s fucking important… it absolutely isn’t your right to not be publicly damaged for being an obvious shit-heel who is clearly lying every second they aren’t under oath.

        I think it’s important to distinguish those two things.

    • Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      I watched a documentary about Alex Jones’ court case with the Sandy Hook victims and he did the exact same thing. In court he does nothing, but as soon as he’s back in front of a camera he’s straight back to peddling lies and crying injustice.