• 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    There should be a lot of proactively checking in with the people you manage and addressing/heading off problems, plus seeing what their priorities are. Training and assessment (which requires a lot of attention to do well) are big, too.

    Not underselling the drain of “manager your manager” stuff, but there’s a lot of other real tasks, too. I’m in a job where a number of those I mentioned are lacking and their absence creates a ton of issues.

    • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      There should be a lot of proactively checking in with the people you manage and addressing/heading off problems, plus seeing what their priorities are.

      I’d argue that takes around 10% of a given week unless you start micromanaging deeply

      raining and assessment (which requires a lot of attention to do well) are big, too.

      Training takes a lot of work but I’d argue if you’re a good manager a constant need to train new people points back at shitty work enviroment you have to deal with. You keep nigh the same team for like 3 years and in the grand scheme of things job training is not really eating up your hours

        • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          True, true, however I’d argue anything over like 5 - 10 people or so is organisational failure again because it just becomes unmanageable for above reasons

          Not that it don’t happen, don’t get me wrong, but that’s just squeezing people

          • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s really hard to make general statements because of the variance in work environments. A big box store, a large restaurant, a factory, a mine, an agricultural job, etc. may have quite a few more people than 10-15 working per shift, but may only require one manager per shift. Those are the areas where managerial work is light (as you pointed out) so you can scale up without adding much more of it. I can also think of more complex jobs where workers are pretty self-contained (law, accounting, medicine), where if your workforce is experienced enough you may need only light managerial work.

            • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              may have quite a few more people than 10-15 working per shift, but may only require one manager per shift. Those are the areas where managerial work is light (as you pointed out) so you can scale up without adding much more of it.

              I disagree heavily here, again. It’s just all of those people are getting fucking fleeced because nobody wants to pay for a foreman. Join a Union, folks.