• CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    It means anyone picking a “side” in the US vs Tiktok debate should reconsider their position (imo anyways)

    • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I didn’t pick aside. I don’t use TikTok and I don’t care who owns it. But I live in the US, theoretically I would rather one entity spying on me than two lol

      • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Why not zero? Aim higher fam, people let themselves be surveilled too easily these days without any resistance

        • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          If I don’t want to be spied on by the US I would have to leave the country, which is not exactly an option. Then I would have to determine a country that does not spy on its citizens or is otherwise not spied on heavily by another country. I’d be very curious with that list looks like. I imagine it’s very small, and very undesirable.

          I use a lot of digital tools to protect my privacy and have fought for digital privacy rights directly. Don’t lecture me please.

          Where is this magical land you live?

          Honestly I’m just getting tired of discussions where people lecture me about “just taking it laying down“ as if somehow I have the ability to end the US surveillance state or otherwise opt out of it. I have limited options, as do all of us. I am acknowledging reality, not saying I endorse it or don’t even push back where I can. These kinds of comments are flippant and annoying.

          TL;DR: zero isn’t a real option today so don’t act like it is.