• BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I think they’re arguing that the bigger the middle, the better. It seems like you two might be arguing the same thing. Making everyone middle is functionally equivalent to removing classes

    • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah but striving for a “middle” class implies the existence of an upper and lower class. If you’re already in fantasy land (uncorrupt government) why not make the fantasy as ideal as possible? Answer: for conservatives the ideal is having an upper and lower class because conservatives seem to inherently think they deserve more than other members of society, even if the reality is that they’re lower class, they need the existence of an upper class so they have someone’s boots to lick. Since they’re just one big idea away from being upper class obviously.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah but striving for a “middle” class implies the existence of an upper and lower class.

        There is, and always has been. You’re putting the cart before the horse. We are so far removed from removing class, it’s not worth discussing. Expanding the middle class is an achievable goal, and works towards what you’re talking about.