• Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 days ago

    I gotcha:

    • Btrfs
      • BTree File System
        • A Copy on White file system that supports snapshots, supported mostly by
    • ZFS
      • Zetabyte File System
        • Copy on Write File System. Less flexible than BTRFS but generally more robust and stable. Better compression in my experience than BTRFS. Out of Kernel Linux support and native FreeBSD.
    • HFS+
      • what Mac uses, I have no clue about this. some Copy on Write stuff.
    • NTFS
      • Windows File System
      • From what I know, no compression or COW
      • In my experience less stable than ext4/ZFS but maybe it’s better nowadays.
    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      Great summary, but I’ve to add that NTFS is WAY more stable than ext4 when it comes to hardware glitches and/or power failures. ZFS is obviously superior to both but overkill for most people, BTRFS should be a nice middle ground and now even NAS manufacturers like Synology are migrating ext4 into BTRFS.

      • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Well that’s good to know because I had some terrible luck with it about a decade ago. Although I don’t think I would go back to windows, I just don’t need it for work anymore and it’s become far too complex.

        I’ve also had pretty bad luck with BTRFS though, although it seems to have improved a lot in the past 3 years that I’ve been using it.

        ZFS would be good but having to rebuild the kernel module is a pain in the ass because when it fails to build you’re unbootable (on root). I also don’t like how clones are dependant on parents, requires a lot of forethought when you’re trying to create a reproducible build on eg Gentoo.