• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    You keep asking why you should care, that question is irrelivent as your actions show you care deeply. I don’t know why you care so deeply were you just looking for a win in this argument?

      • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        The only exception is if Joe is implicated. But you haven’t shown any concrete evidence that this is the case.

        You keep making an argument against Joe being involved, from the start I’ve stated there’s no evidence he was involved. I don’t know how it’s so confusing for you to understand but here we are.

        Therefore it just seems like you just want to hate this guy, implying you’re the one who cares. Prove me wrong.

        I hate the guy by saying there’s no evidence he’s involved? That might be the dumbest thought to ooze out of your head.

          • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Your proof that I hate the guy is ina comment where I said he wasn’t involved? I know logic is difficult for you but you can do better.

              • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                The question mark at the end of a sentence is an indication that a question was asked. Was that too difficult of a question for you to answer?

                  • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    It wasn’t a difficult question

                    Then you would have answered it.

                    it just showed how little you understood my argument.

                    Your argument is that I’m obsessed with getting Joe based on a comment where I aknowledged there is no evidence of Joe’s involvement, and that is the only way I mentioned Joe.

                    Please show me the comment where I am out to get Joe.