minnix@lemux.minnix.dev to Philosophy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoNoam Chomsky, 95, ‘no longer able to talk’ as intellectual’s ‘health deteriorates’www.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up1433arrow-down17cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1426arrow-down1external-linkNoam Chomsky, 95, ‘no longer able to talk’ as intellectual’s ‘health deteriorates’www.independent.co.ukminnix@lemux.minnix.dev to Philosophy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square75fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·5 months agoYour position is: We don’t know what it is, but AI certainly won’t have it? Does not seem rigorous.
minus-squareSweetpeaches69@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-25 months agoLol. Lmao even. Imagine thinking so rigidly. Plenty of things were known of before it was known how exactly they work. My position is: We know something is causing this, but our understanding of it is currently infantile.
Your position is:
We don’t know what it is, but AI certainly won’t have it?
Does not seem rigorous.
Lol. Lmao even.
Imagine thinking so rigidly. Plenty of things were known of before it was known how exactly they work. My position is:
We know something is causing this, but our understanding of it is currently infantile.
QED