• CommunistCuddlefish [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    a medical or surgical grade mask for the purpose of preventing the spread of contagious disease,

    OK cool that’s why people wear masks so doesn’t that nullify the entire bill? Making the entire bill pointless and toothless anyway?

    Before covid I wore bandannas at protests to hide my face. After covid I’ve worn respirators at protests to prevent a disabling disease from spreading to or from me.

    • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 days ago

      Depends. Are cops allowed to say “it’s unreasonable for someone to wear a mask to avoid the spread of disease since the pandemic is over” and arrest you anyway?

    • dead [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 days ago

      You can read the bill here https://webservices.ncleg.gov/ViewBillDocument/2023/8694/0/H237-PCCS40622-CE-5

      The first thing I notice is that on page 2, line 10. it crosses out wearing a mask for “ensuring the physical health or safety of the wearer or others” and replaces the text with “preventing the spread of contagious disease.”

      Then on page 2 line 27-29, it says that anyone wearing a mask for the reason of preventing the spread of contagious disease “shall remove the mask upon request by a law enforcement officer” and “remove the mask upon request by the owner or occupant of public or private property where the wearer is present to allow for identification of the wearer.”

      Page 3 line 38 says “A person who willfully stands, sits, or lies upon the highway or street in such a manner as to impede the regular flow of traffic.traffic is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor.”

      Then on the end of Page 4 through Page 5, it gets really sneaky and starts to redefine the limit on the amount of money the Federal PACs are allowed to donate to “candidate or political committee”

      https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article289180139.html

      The bill doesn’t change the prohibition on corporations being able to give to state parties or candidates. And federal political committee contributions would still be limited to $6,400 to most political committees for an election. However, the bill allows federal PACs and 527s to use separate accounts, funded only through unlimited contributions by individuals, to donate to a political party or an affiliated party committee.

      But now federal super PACs will be subject to the new limits in the bill, if it becomes law.

      This bill also helps federal entities shift their money around, said Bob Hall, a longtime elections watchdog. Under the bill, “a big entity – federal entity – that has corporate money and individual money can use the individual money to make donations,” said Hall.

      “It is a laundry scheme in a way,” Hall said. “It does allow large, particularly individual donations, millionaires, billionaires to send $600,000 to the Republican Governors Association, the Democratic Governors Association.” Both groups are 527s.

      thonk