• M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          16 days ago

          Where are your primary sources?

          Does that also mean you don’t understand what they are?

          See this does not work the way you think it does.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            16 days ago

            I’m not the one making the claim. I’m saying that I have not seen any official Russian statement to this effect. However, if you have a source for one then please show it.

            See this does not work the way you think it does.

            • sweng@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              16 days ago

              You are the one claiming the given sources are incorrect. You are the one making a claim, and you are the one the burden of proof falls on.

              You are really hurting the Russian case here. They do their best to act all tough and intimidating, and here all you come with is crying about not liking the provided sources. You’re making them look even worse then they already do.

                • sweng@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  Yes, and then what? Are you somehow suggesting that only primary sources can be used as sources? I’ve never heard anyine take that position before.

                  Of course, one can challenge sources (of any type) but that does usully require some type of argument for why the source is incorrect, and not just because you don’t like it.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    16 days ago

                    I’m suggesting that when you say Russian red lines have been crossed without consequences, you need to provide primary sources from Russia regarding what Russian red lines are. I see this is a very difficult concept for you to grasp.

                    Of course, one can challenge sources (of any type) but that does usully require some type of argument for why the source is incorrect, and not just because you don’t like it.

                    The source is incorrect because the red lines claimed in the source haven’t actually been articulated by Russia, and none of the links in your source actually trace back to statements from Russia. So, claiming Russian red lines have been crossed when there is zero actual evidence these were Russian red lines is nonsensical.

                  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    16 days ago

                    Oh its so much funnier then that, They then provide non primary sources while demanding everyone else “Proves” them wrong only with primary sources. This is a joke at this point.

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              16 days ago

              They did and some of us watched it live (we are told) on russian state TV in 2022,2023 and just last month. Please provide primary sources that contradict what I witnessed.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                16 days ago

                still waiting for that official statement bud, should be really easy to find since you obviously wouldn’t make things up

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    16 days ago

                    Again, feel free to link to the part of the parade where Putin says what you two are claiming he said. Should be really easy to do since it’s publicly available.