• UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    17 days ago

    Genuinely surprised you haven’t heard about HDR before.

    It’s not needed for office work, but for media consumption it has been a big thing for at least half a decade at this point. I’m not sure you’ll find a modern TV that doesn’t support it at this point.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      I’m not him, but my TV is a 2007 1080p LCD Dumb TV. I’m not sure I need HDR support.

      OH and I have a CRT upstairs, tiny with the VCR combo.

      • xycu@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 days ago

        I have a Samsung 4K HDR 120hz TV and can’t really tell any difference between it and my ancient non-smart Phillips LCD TV that it replaced.

        I have an Xbox series x with 4k hdr enabled and everything still just looks “normal” to me.

        120hz is slightly noticeable compared to 60 in games that support it, but not a huge deal. 99%+ of what i do on my TV isn’t 4K, HDR, or 120hz, so it’s not extremely valuable. From “couch distance” anything above 720p is unnoticeable anyway.

        I also have a windows 11 laptop with 4k HDR screen and disabled HDR in settings because the colors were all horrible looking with it on. Honestly I run it in 1080 instead of 4k because it uses less battery, performs better, and many programs don’t work correctly at 4K, and i can’t tell the difference anyway. Tiny pixels are still tiny.

        I realize this whole comment may come off as old man “get off my lawn” fist-shaking. I’m not trying to downplay other people’s experiences who seem to be genuinely impressed by these features, and maybe I’m just “holding it wrong”, but for me, personally, I regret spending extra for the whole 4K HDR thing.