• Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    13 days ago

    Its a tax scheme.

    The pharmacy claims this medication is worth $275, insurance covers $40, and then they get as much as they can out of the patient while claiming the rest as a loss they can write off on their taxes.

    US healthcare is stupid.

    • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      90
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      You should really be replacing stupid with “evil”

      That’s fucking evil and the cunts should be held accountable for their evil

      But yous won’t cos you’re pussies

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        13 days ago

        I’d say US healthcare is toxic, and behaves despicably toward those in its care. It’s also inefficient and often counterproductive.

        All of this is a result of stupidity and evil, coming both from outside the industry, as well as perpetually generated by the already-ill structure of the industry.

        It warps the minds of those who join it, as customers, providers, and regulators. We’re all like software devs loyal to the terrible architecture of a bad codebase due to having to adapt to it to get anything done.

        Fucked up systems fuck people up.

      • luckystarr@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Nope. It’s consequential. They need to raise their shareholder value in any way that’s legal, even if it’s not morally right. If they won’t do that, they’d get into trouble. For corporations tax loopholes are there to be exploited.

        Making those loopholes illegal is what will fix this. Then you can call it good craftsmanship by politicians. Right now you can barley call it shoddy.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      13 days ago

      It looks like the pharmacies do not get the tax write offs, if any. It’s the drug manufacturers who get to double dip by charging insurers for whatever they’re willing to cover, and then write off the rest causing tax payers to foot the bill.

      Regardless, I agree with the article that there needs to be legislation that both bans these type of “shell game” programs, and capping the price of medications. And for what it’s worth, I don’t care if that means companies don’t make as much money. They’ll still make money, and the drugs do not actually cost that much to make.

    • nadiaraven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      It’s also a scheme for the pharmacies to get as much as they can from the insurance companies.

    • Zorcron
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      It’s not the pharmacies that set the prices. At least, not really. The pharmacy pays near the listed “cash-price” for the drug from the wholesaler, who buys from the manufacturer, so the pharmacy can’t really afford to charge much less than they do for many drugs.

      And the price the patient sees after insurance is decided based on the insurance or pharmacy benefit manager who deals with prescription benefits for the insurance.

      Pharmacies are also contractually prevented from charging less to a cash-paying patient than what they charge to the insurance companies, so you start getting weirdness with coupon cards to work around that.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        The benefits managers are in on it with both the insurance and pharmacies. When you choose insurance in the US, there’s only one pharmacy brand that you get good benefits at. The drug prices at the others are either insane or not covered at all.